Kelty Redwing 32 Vs 44: Backpack Review

Kelty Redwing 32 Vs 44: Backpack Review

Without a doubt, one of the most important aspects of hiking, trekking or backpacking is choosing the right gear.

After some research, most people arrive at the conclusion that brands like Kelty should be considered.

However, it may be daunting for beginners to make a selection between two great models such as the Kelty Redwing 32 and the Kelty Redwing 44.

Quick comparison: Kelty Redwing 32 vs. Kelty Redwing 44

 Kelty Redwing 44
Our Best Pick
Kelty Redwing 32
Images
Volume44 L32 L
Frame TypeInternalInternal
Torso Fit Range5 - 18.5 inOne size
Weight2 lbs 10 oz2 lbs
SuspensionLightBeam single aluminum stayHDPE Frame Sheet
Pockets1 interior slip, 7 exterior1 interior slip, 6 exterior
PriceCheck PriceCheck Price

Kelty Redwing 44 Video Review

Kelty Redwing 32 Video Review

Size and Capacity

At first sight, you will probably not be able to tell the difference in size that exists between the Kelty Redwing 32 and the Kelty Redwing 44. However, further inspection will reveal that the former is slightly smaller and lighter.

Being 25 inches in height and 15 inches in width, the Kelty Redwing 44 is somewhat taller and bulkier than its counterpart.

Measuring 22 inches in height and 11 in width, the Kelty Redwing 32 is large enough to fit everything you need comfortably.

Largely, this is due to the versatile and ample design both backpacks have. Of course, the Kelty Redwing 44 will allow a few extra items to be carried. However, the difference between the two is not overwhelming by any means.

In terms of capacity, there is an important difference between these two backpack models. While the Kelty Redwing 32 has only 32 liters (1900 cubic inches) of capacity, the Kelty Redwing 44 has 44 liters (2685 cubic inches) of capacity.

Without a doubt, this fact can make a huge difference, particularly during extended hiking or trekking expeditions where it’s important to carry as much as possible.

Weight

As previously mentioned, apart from being larger, the Kelty Redwing 44 (2 lb 10 oz) is slightly heavier than then Kelty Redwing 32 (2 lb).

Even though it may not seem like much, those extra 10 ounces can make a difference during extended periods of hiking, trekking, climbing or any other physical activity.

However, that difference is small enough to be discounted as a deciding factor. As a result, weight difference is not an issue that needs much pondering in this particular case.

Construction

In terms of manufacturing technique and quality, both the Kelty Redwing 32 and the Kelty Redwing 44 are basically identical. Materials-wise, both models use polyester 420D Small Black Stafford as its main fabric. As reinforcement material, both models have the Poly 75x150D Tasser Coal fabric.

The main differences between both backpacks lie in how they are structurally built. One the principal differences between the Kelty Redwing 32 and the Kelty Redwing 44 is in their frame.

While the Kelty 32 only has an HDPE frame, the Kelty Redwing 44 has a LightBeam aluminum stay in addition to its HDPE frame. This stay helps provide stability and balance.

Torso Fit Range

Something else that differentiates both backpack models is the torso fit range. In order to adjust itself more precisely to your body frame, the Kelty Redwing 44 has a torso fit range that goes from 37 centimeters to 47 centimeters. By comparison, the Kelty Redwing 32 has a single torso fit that can’t be adjusted or changed in any way.

Pockets

Both the Kelty Redwing 32 and the Kelty Redwing 33 boast a design that prioritizes packing efficiency. One of the main ways in which it does this is using various pockets of various sizes.

In both cases, the pockets are distributed in a smart manner that makes packing (and unpacking) very comfortable for you.

Both models have dual side pockets, front pockets, top pockets and an interior slip that works as an extra pocket for holding laptops and other objects.

In terms of pockets, the difference between the two models lies in the fact that the Kelty Redwing 44 has one more pocket than its counterpart.

Comfort

Without a doubt, both the Kelty Redwing 32 and the Kelty Redwing 44 are incredibly comfortable. Their design and fit are very ergonomic, allowing users to maintain the walking posture that is most comfortable for them without causing strain or pain.

However, the Redwing 44 has a couple of noticeable advantages over the Redwing 32. Namely, the Redwing 44 has a LightBeam aluminum stay in addition to its HDPE frame, improving its stability and balance.

At the same time, the former backpack’s adjustable torso fit frame greatly enhances your ability to carry it in an ergonomic and healthy fashion.

Special Features

Taking into account how similar they are, it’s no surprise that both backpack models have the same basic features. For one, both are hydration compatible thanks to their specially designed hydration sleeve. At the same time, they both use side compression straps to improve stability.

Another noticeable feature they share is their hybrid loading system that allows both top and panel loading. Pocket-wise, they both also have zippered side pockets and water bottle pockets that increase their versatility. Interestingly enough, both models also have loops that can help carry useful objects such as an ice ax or a trekking pole.

>>Learn more about Camelbak Lobo Vs Mule Hydration Packs<<

Conclusion

After going through this review, you probably realized that there are no huge differences between these two backpack models.

However, it is clear that, due to its higher capacity and enhanced fitting, the Kelty Redwing 44 is a better choice for hiking, trekking and backpacking.

Breana
 

Chief editor here at Sky-Liners, Breana is a former expat and outdoor enthusiast who grew up on camping, hunting, and hiking. If she could live anywhere, it would be a tree fort in the woods. For now, she's surviving on weekly hiking trips and monthly mountain breaks. You can read more about Breana's adventures on her blog at 3rdCultureWife.

Click Here to Leave a Comment Below 0 comments

Leave a Reply: